Group Decision Making
SpiceLogic AHP Software supports group decision making. Each decision-maker can create an AHP project file and save it to a shared network location. Another user can then import those project files into the same AHP software and calculate an aggregated group decision.
No cloud setup is required. The important rule is that all member project files must use the same decision structure: the same criteria and subcriteria hierarchy, and the same options.
Here is an example. Suppose three decision-makers, Mike, Robert, and William, saved their AHP projects in these shared locations:
- \\Network shared\\ahp decisions\\mike.ahpDecision
- \\Network shared\\ahp decisions\\robert.ahpDecision
- \\Network shared\\ahp decisions\\william.ahpDecision
Start AHP Software and click the Group Decision menu.

Click the "Import member project files" button.

Click "Add a member" to add the first member project file.

The member manager opens. From here, you can add, edit, or delete group members and their project-file paths.

This is a typical member manager view after member project files have been loaded.

After you add the member project files, the group decision aggregation is calculated automatically.

Aggregation Methods
SpiceLogic AHP Software supports two aggregation methods: AIJ (Aggregation of Individual Judgments) and AIP (Aggregation of Individual Priorities).
Aggregation of Individual Judgments
AIJ aggregates each member's pairwise comparisons using a weighted geometric mean. After the aggregated pairwise comparison matrices are built, the regular priority calculation method is used to calculate final option priorities.
For example, suppose Mike and Robert each have a pairwise comparison matrix. Each cell in the final aggregated matrix is created from the geometric mean of the matching cells in their matrices.

Aggregation of Individual Priorities
AIP is simpler. It takes each member's final calculated priority for an option and then calculates the arithmetic mean.
For example, suppose Mike gives Car 1 a final priority of 0.3 and Car 2 a final priority of 0.7. Robert gives Car 1 a final priority of 0.2 and Car 2 a final priority of 0.8. The aggregated priority for Car 1 is the arithmetic mean of 0.3 and 0.2, which is 0.25. The aggregated priority for Car 2 is the arithmetic mean of 0.7 and 0.8, which is 0.75.

Selecting an Aggregation Method
In the Group Decision tab, use the two radio buttons to choose the aggregation method. By default, AIJ (Aggregation of Individual Judgments) is selected. Click the "i" button beside a method to see a visual explanation of how that method works.
